Saturday, August 29, 2020

Big Questions

 

I was quoted by a doctoral student saying that “things change.” What I have said on multiple occasions is that technologies change … technologies change what people do … what people can do … what people will want to do.” It is Heraclitus, an ancient Greek philosopher, who argued that things change. What he actually said, according to other early Greeks familiar with Heraclitus’ lost book, was panta rhei – variously translated as everything flows or everything is in flux. Thinking of the essence of everything flowing like a river, Plato writes in the Cratylus that one cannot step into the same river twice since the water is continuously changing, and Plutarch takes it further noting that one cannot step into the same river once as the concept of sameness is then lost both for the river and for the individual. People are continuously changing and evolving along with everything else, according to Heraclitus’s philosophy.

While there are problems and inconsistencies in Heraclitus’ philosophy as it has come down to us over the ages (see https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heraclitus/), and Heraclitus clearly influenced subsequent thinkers, what is notable is the early form of humanism found in Heraclitus as expressed in the notion that a guardian spirit is inherent in human nature. While there is much to unpack in that notion, the ordinary interpretation in modern English would seem to lead one to deny that notion.

Nonetheless, thinking about this reminds me of a note in one of Bouwsma’s (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oets_Kolk_Bouwsma) unpublished notebooks – namely that one’s life must show what one thinks of oneself. One cannot judge one’s own life, a rare mistake that Nietzsche attributes to Socrates, as others will judge one based on what one is doing and has done and those things accumulate over time. Each choice or decision that one takes makes one more like one kind of person and less like another kind of person. The unanswerable question that one should be asking is what kind of person one is becoming.

Perhaps that is the unique trait of being human – the ability to ask unanswerable questions. Unfortunately, some people claim to have those answers about themselves.

Thursday, August 20, 2020

We the people

We be the people … the people of these divided states, with plates of plenty for a select few, 

A select few, who with silver spoons in twisted tongues, separated mothers from their young, 

Young ones, starving at the rivers edge, in order to float across to this land of plenty, 

Plenty for those who have plenty and want to establish plenty more for those select few, 

Who insure domestic inequity, provide for their own defense, promote welfare for the wealthy, 

And secure self-praise and blessings to themselves and their progeny, and a few loyal friends, 

So weep the people … we the people of these united fates of America … the bountiful America. 

A new preamble for #45's new Constitution …. Mike Spector, August, 2020 

P.S. 

20,000 lies and counting - see https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/13/president-trump-has-made-more-than-20000-false-or-misleading-claims/ 

5.5 million cases and counting - see https://www.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases 

952 pagesdocumenting Russian interfence in the election that contnues - see https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf 

Trump's bankruptcies - see https://www.abi.org/feed-item/examining-donald-trump%E2%80%99s-chapter-11-bankruptcies 

Times that Trump paid no income tax - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_returns_of_Donald_Trump#:~:text=On%20March%2014%2C%202017%2C%20the,%2438%20million%20in%20federal%20taxes. 

Improvement in Trump's golf game after almost 300 games since taking office - zero; see https://thegolfnewsnet.com/golfnewsnetteam/2020/08/15/how-many-times-president-donald-trump-played-golf-in-office-103836/ 


Numberof people who think Mike Spector's views are garbage - still counting

Sunday, August 16, 2020

honor among theives

  I took the following oath as a cadet at USAFA: " I will not lie, steal, or cheat, nor tolerate anyone who does.' I left that Air Force as a young intelligence officer due to the many lies being told by the intelligence community about the conflict in Vietnam. 


Now I am thinking about the temporary occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. He has told about 20,000 lies since being elected, stolen the election from HRC with the  help of the GRU - Russian military intelligence agency, and  he is now planning to cheat in the next election with the help of (a) the US Postmaster General Louis DeJoy (no joy in that black heart), (b) the US Attorney General William Barr (a smooth talker with a twisted tongue), (c) Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell - who got a federal loan to a company he owns with his wealthy wife, Elaine Chao, Secretary of Transportation,  through the Paycheck Protection, , Program, and (d) so many other self-aggrandizing Trumplicans. 

So hard to tolerate ... harder to tolerate the 36% who support that person regardless of how mean-spirited, self-centered, and uncaring about others he becomes ... all in plain sight with those who bother to look and process what they see. Open eyes, open hearts, open minds, stop separating families at the border, stop the systemic racism that I thought had ended years ago, think about evidence, and apply that rare gift and uniquely human capability - namely, logical reasoning. 

Saturday, August 1, 2020

Talking to myself

 

Talking to myself

In the several months I have been working at home and have been mostly alone due to COVID-19, I have developed the habit of having conversations with myself. It is so important to have someone with whom to discuss issues and ask questions. As my students can attest, I am mostly inclined to ask questions, so it has been good to have someone here to answer those questions. These conversations with myself have led me to identify a number of hypocrisies which are the focus of these remarks. I only recently realized how hypocritical I have become, so I have my interlocutor to thank for that realization.

Q: If one really supports the first amendment and free speech, and, how can one protest speeches on a campus which conflict with one’s beliefs, such as opposing the rights of the KKK to come to campus and give a talk on white supremacy (see http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/education/all_amendments_usconst.htm)? 

A: Let them talk and avoid any confrontations with those people while they are on campus. Then, schedule a talk by others about the many contributions to society and the country made by non-white citizens (see https://www.nortonlifelock.com/blogs/diversity-inclusion/black-innovators-who-made-huge-impact-technology_/   and   https://www.times-news.com/african-americans-have-made-valuable-contributions/article_cea03a6a-c58b-5918-905b-b71d851bca7c.html).

Q: How can one protest wearing a mask when out and about during COVID-19 on the basis of freedom of choice, but gladly acknowledge the importance of having everyone wear seat belts in cars?

A: One cannot reconcile such dissonant beliefs, nor can two, but one might initiate a conversation about the social contract that is the foundation of all democracies (see https://iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/).

Q: How can a person who claims the right not to wear a mask on the basis of freedom of choice, deny freedom of choice to a woman wishing to have an abortion?

A: Mind your own business, and think about the possibility of you harming others by not wearing a mask (see https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/p0714-americans-to-wear-masks.html).

Q; How can a person reconcile a belief in minimizing the role of the national government and the budget for the national government with the significant increase in the national government’s budget and intrusion into the everyday affairs of citizens?

A: Ask #45 (see also https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS721US721&biw=1222&bih=573&sxsrf=ALeKk02xUrK-fIyKAzwuQ0MA4EB6yyWYlw%3A1596305321546&ei=qa8lX_LlII_SsAWwq6LoCg&q=trump+budget+deficit&oq=trump+budget+deficit&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzoECAAQRzoECCMQJzoOCC4QsQMQgwEQkQIQiwM6CAgAEJECEIsDOg4ILhCxAxDHARCjAhCLAzoLCAAQsQMQgwEQiwM6BwgAEEMQiwM6DggAELEDEIMBEJECEIsDOhQILhCxAxDHARCjAhCLAxCnAxCoAzoLCC4QsQMQgwEQkQI6CwgAELEDEIMBEJECOggIABCxAxCDAToECAAQQzoFCAAQsQM6CAguEMcBEK8BOgIIADoFCAAQkQI6BAgAEAo6BQguEJMCUPsgWOFGYIJIaABwAXgAgAGTAYgBihGSAQQ2LjE0mAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpergBAsABAQ&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwiy3pLdzPrqAhUPKawKHbCVCK0Q4dUDCAw&uact=5).

Q: How can #45 ban TicTok from the Internet but let consumers continue going to AMC theaters?

A: See https://www.axios.com/working-for-china-1515542281-d4bc0ab4-bed6-4085-a26e-c5d7c66be74c.html and start thinking for yourself.

Okay, I will try to start thinking for myself, which is what my students often advise me to do (and they referred me to #276 in Nietzsche's "The Gay Science" - https://web.stanford.edu/~jsabol/existentialism/materials/nietzsche-gay-science-hurry.pdf00).

 

J. Michael Spector, 1 Aug 2020